normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Graham Inggs graham at nerve.org.za
Sat Nov 21 12:06:32 UTC 2015


On 20 November 2015 at 14:06, Jerome BENOIT <calculus at rezozer.net> wrote:
> It appears that the faulty one is the one in the archive, if it makes sense to say so.
> For a least two reasons:
> 1] ` ./debian/rules get-orig-source ' gives the one in the git;
> 2] the one in the archive is certainly derive from the git itself.
>
> Do I miss something here ?
> What is the best way to fix this ?

I've just run your get-orig-source rule and ended up with a 3rd
version of the orig.tar.xz.
I guess re-compressing with uscan is not reproducible (yet?).

So yes, the faulty one is in the archive.  The uploader of your
package should have used 'pristine-tar checkout' instead of running
the get-orig-source rule.

Unless there is something wrong with the version in the archive (have
you compared the files?), I suggest deleting
normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.id and
normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.delta from the pristine-tar branch and
running 'gbp import-orig' on the version that in the archive.



More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list