normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Jerome BENOIT calculus at rezozer.net
Sun Nov 22 05:04:23 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Again:

On 21/11/15 13:06, Graham Inggs wrote:
> On 20 November 2015 at 14:06, Jerome BENOIT <calculus at rezozer.net> wrote:
>> It appears that the faulty one is the one in the archive, if it makes sense to say so.
>> For a least two reasons:
>> 1] ` ./debian/rules get-orig-source ' gives the one in the git;
>> 2] the one in the archive is certainly derive from the git itself.
>>
>> Do I miss something here ?
>> What is the best way to fix this ?
> 
> I've just run your get-orig-source rule and ended up with a 3rd
> version of the orig.tar.xz.
> I guess re-compressing with uscan is not reproducible (yet?).

It appeared that tar does not produced reproducible balls.

> 
> So yes, the faulty one is in the archive.  The uploader of your
> package should have used 'pristine-tar checkout' instead of running
> the get-orig-source rule.

Ok.

> 
> Unless there is something wrong with the version in the archive (have
> you compared the files?), I suggest deleting
> normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.id and
> normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.delta from the pristine-tar branch and
> running 'gbp import-orig' on the version that in the archive.
> 

I have just done the dirty manoeuvre and some checks:
it should be ok now.

Thanks,
Jerome
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWUUzCAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjemsH/3CPochrA3FT/2zkaqiQfBlP
KNPZneD3No2AkW/KY/c0uk0d/Dz+ylv8SV5lx/AVzO+bEyUbb+CRoVNq8vgTYybT
gnyz4vW1mKoW+z2/Yg0GseBYghL95d9wf10svhNY55pRFBcJj2E5klp2JXCBPLmh
oRrblGYUAYUoqBOo+uHGsjM8m0Iz4tF4kEw22WAnqs61WhqkRePUzg+JjTAkKn3v
Ewy4Ko7S9waSCFBScLFLkBB6/oEZMftqYOkQkxv15eQkyCt0X0PkC6Iapkn/nJPx
ibtNokV/FvhUpknYb5T9rqfFKlQsqZqb24PhpsLrOAM6RAyi4gAqmP5bk3o9MqM=
=JP7t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list