Bug#787861: review: polyml

[James Clarke]

Hi Gianfranco,

>> I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository) enabling all hardening flags. I also realised that the new polyc shell script requires gcc and >libffi-dev to produce standalone executables, so I have added those as dependencies for polyml.
> 
> wonderful, I'll upload again then :)

Great, thanks.

>> Should I push my changes to debian-science/packages/polyml.git (especially since that’s the repository in debian/control)? Also, going forwards, if I want to get a >new version uploaded, do I need to file a new RFS “bug” against sponsorship-requests, or should I instead just email debian-science asking for a team upload >(subject to a review of the package)?
> 
> yes, and if you can't do it I can do it for you :)

Pushed.

> For another upload you can ping me directly or add an RFS bug, as you prefer.

Ok, I’ll probably come to you first then seeing as creating an RFS bug can be a nuisance; having the same uploader would make sense, rather than some new person having to start from scratch with the package every time. Of course, if you ever want me to find someone else, please say so; I’ll understand :)

Thanks,
James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20151017/d41a33ba/attachment.sig>