Bug#818990: Is it really a flint problem?
Mattia Rizzolo
mattia at debian.org
Tue Apr 19 10:22:24 UTC 2016
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:04:31AM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (1) according to:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=flint&suite=sid
> the version 2.5.2-3 of flint built perfectly on amd64.
yeah, that's a past tense.
> (2) more recently (yesterday) :
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=flint&suite=experimental
> the version 2.5.2-4 of flint built perfectly on amd64.
that's a different version.
> (3) many tests on different amd64 systems (three by myself, and a few others
> from people on #debian-mentors) didn't have any issue with 2.5.2-4 either.
that's still a different version.
Don't try to mix versions thinking it's always the same.
> This suggest the package isn't at fault and the rare systems where the
> failures occurred should be double-checked for the real root of the problem.
Indeed, with the very same chroot, I can build -4, but -3 FTBFS.
Evidently, this:
- \left|\frac{a_{n-2}}{a_n}\right|^{\frac{1}{2}}, \dots
+ \left|\frac{a_{n-2}}{a_n}\right|^{\frac{1}{2}}, \dotsc
Is enough to fix this bug, and it also makes sense, given that the
failure log we pointed to you fails while doing latex stuff.
I'd say: mark this bug as fixed in that version, add the number to the
changelog and upload to unstable (why in first case that one went to
experimental?)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20160419/937f2c23/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list