Bug#741196: License incompatibility below RC threshold

[Francesco Poli]

On Sat, 2 May 2015 18:34:31 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:49:55 +0100 Niels Thykier wrote:
> 
> > Hi FTP masters,
> > 
> > We have been prodded about the severity of #741196
> [ the prod is https://bugs.debian.org/741196#101 ]
> > However, being a license interpretation issue, we would like to
> > defer the judgement to you on this one (suggested in comment #39).
> >   You may find the mail from Russ Allbery at [1] relevant for narrowing
> > down the possible issue (which is AFAICT a "choice of venue" clause).
> > 
> > If you believe this is (or might be) a grave issue, please upgrade the
> > severity at your earliest convenience and notify us.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > ~Niels
> > 
> > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/01/msg00264.html
> 
> Dear Release Team, dear FTP masters,
> just as I feared, jessie was released with this license incompatibility
> unaddressed.
> 
> 
> I believe I presented all the relevant facts to explain why there
> indeed is an incompatibility between the CeCILL-C and the GNU GPL
> licenses.
> Russ Allbery agreed that this may actually be a problem.
> 
> Yet, the package maintainers do not believe that there is an issue and
> they keep the bug severity below the RC threshold, while waiting for
> some official pronouncement from the FTP masters.
> This official statement from the FTP masters has been requested
> multiple times, but seems to never arrive.
> 
> Could you please take the time to address this issue during the stretch
> development cycle?
> 
> Looking forward to hearing back from you.
> Thanks for your time.


Dear Release Team, dear FTP masters,
once again this issue has been left unaddressed for quite some time,
unfortunately.

I think it should be taken care of as soon as possible, lest it slip
through another stable release.

Please re-read (at least):

https://bugs.debian.org/741196#5
https://bugs.debian.org/741196#53
https://bugs.debian.org/741196#96
https://bugs.debian.org/741196#111

What do you think should be done?

Once again, looking forward to hearing back from you.

Thanks for any help you may provide in solving this issue once and for
all.


-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20160423/b32330c4/attachment.sig>