Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

Andreas Beckmann anbe at debian.org
Wed Feb 3 16:16:27 UTC 2016


Control: found -1 3.3.2~r63423-1

On 2016-02-03 11:45, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Julien Cristau <jcristau at debian.org> wrote:
>>> The v5 transition was entirely unnecessary for this package, and I very
>>> strongly want it gone.
>>>
>> You haven't given a single good reason to revert the change.  Maybe you
>> would have preferred it didn't, but you're coming 6 months late to that
>> party.
> 
> Apologies!
> 
> What is the best way to fix this?

Probably reverting the reverted transition, therefore reopening this bug.

You can drop the v5 suffix once upstream bumps the SOVERSION again and
you have to rename the package anyway.


Andreas



More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list