Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

[Nico Schlömer]

The binutils support in trilinos is far from being critical, so I'd say for
making things a little easier we just turn it off.

@Felix Agreed?

Cheers,
Nico

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:15 AM Helmut Grohne <helmut at subdivi.de> wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 01:04:13PM +0200, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> > if that's correct, we shouldn't link libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so to a
> > particular revision of libbfd-2.26-system.so. how would that be
> > possible?
> >
> > otoh, if libbfd-2.26.1-system.so
> > - is meant to replace libbfd-2.26-system.so, shouldn't there be a
> >   symlink?
> > - is NOT meant to provide libbfd-2.26-system.so, then why are these not
> >   coinstallable?
>
> Dynamically linking libbfd-*-system.so is no allowed. This is explicitly
> stated in the package description of binutils-dev.
>
> If you absolutely must link libbfd, link it statically and add an
> appropriate Built-Using header.
>
> Helmut
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20160718/f00f3737/attachment.html>