sundials_2.7.0+dfsg-1~1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Dima Kogan]

On April 13, 2017 4:55:23 AM PDT, Andreas Tille <andreas at fam-tille.de> wrote:
>
>I wonder whether you think the package names will need some change.  If
>not I think it might make sense to push again to experimental to let it
>pass new queue.  Users should assume that packages in experimental are
>... well, just experimental.  My motivation to suggest this upload is
>that while I fully agree that the examples should work I could in
>parallel check whether other libs needing this library will build.  I
>could concentrate on my initial target and while doing so doing
>parallel
>tests

OK. It's nowhere near done, but probably good enough for experimental. Give me a few days.