Bug#907829: p4est: FTBFS on single CPU machines
Adrian Bunk
bunk at debian.org
Sun Sep 30 19:23:22 BST 2018
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 06:13:13PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>...
> > Building all packages on the baseline is never possible, and I already
> > tried to explain to you that your "1 CPU with unlimited RAM" scenario is
> > pretty far away from the real-world problems.
>
> This is double standards again. Not being able to build all packages
> on the baseline has never been an excuse to not submit baseline
> violations (when we find them) as serious.
>
> You do that, and I fully support it, but for some strange reason
> assumming multi-core is "ok to the point of downgrading this bug"
> while assuming, say, SSE on i386, is not.
>
> Please explain that.
building != running
And I am getting really annoyed of your double standard regarding
build requirements.
If a package cannot be built on a single-core machine with 256 MB RAM
due to the number of CPUs, you claim this would be an enormous problem
equal to dropping support for running Debian on that machine.
But if a package cannot be built on a single-core machine with
256 MB RAM due to the amount of RAM, this is apparently fine for you.
The result is the same in both cases - a machine supported by Debian
cannot build a package.
Feel free to talk to ask the release team if you think I misinterpret
them when saying that single-core FTBFS are not RC, there is nothing
left to be discussed between you and me on that topic.
> Thanks.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list