Bug#875150: Should we file a removal bug?

Moritz Mühlenhoff jmm at inutil.org
Fri Sep 27 21:40:36 BST 2019


On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 07:57:47AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:48:24PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:05:17PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > > Hi! It seems there is no activity on this bug, should we file a removal bug?
> > 
> > Adding the last two uploaders to CC.
> 
> ... as well as Uploaders in d/control in CC.
>  
> > Is anyone of you planning to upload a Qt5 compatible release candidate of qtiplot?
> > Otherwise we'll file a removal bug as we're closing in on the Qt5 removalnow.
> > 
> > (Upload also happen to experimental to avoid a later roundtrip through NEW when a final
> > 1.0 comes out)
> 
> While the website[1] is announcing
> 
>     2019/09/18 - QtiPlot 1.0.0-rc10 release available. New features and improvements: 
> 
> (without mentioning a Qt 5 port explicitly :-() the download area[2]
> does not contain any source download of this.  It seems upstream changed
> to a closed source model since you can only download binaries with
> restricted functionality or you need to buy a license.

I've just filed a removal bug.

Cheers,
        Moritz



More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list