Bug#943451: Is that bug really pplpy's problem?

Julien Puydt julien.puydt at laposte.net
Sun Feb 23 19:46:13 GMT 2020

Previous message (by thread): schroedinger-maeparser_1.2.2-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Next message (by thread): Bug#943451: Is that bug really pplpy's problem?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

it looks more like a doxygen 1.8.16 bug than a pplpy issue, isn't it?

If that is so, then it should be marked as affecting pplpy, but
assigned to doxygen.

Thanks,

JP

Previous message (by thread): schroedinger-maeparser_1.2.2-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Next message (by thread): Bug#943451: Is that bug really pplpy's problem?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list