Bug#948736: pysph FTBFS on most architectures, test failures.
peter green
plugwash at p10link.net
Sun Jan 12 17:43:12 GMT 2020
Package: pysph
Version: 1.0~b0~20191115.gite3d5e10-1
Severity: serious
The most recent upload got pysph building on amd64 on the autobuilders, but it still failed for all the other release architectures (it succeeded for some debian-ports architectures, but some of them may be building with nocheck).
python3-pysph has never built on any release architecture other than amd64, but it is clearly a replacement for python-pysph that has. So I would consider this to be a regression.
Please investigate the test failures and if possible fix them. If you are unable to fix them then you need to make a decision whether the tests in question are relatively unimportant and should be disabled or whether it is unreasonable to support the package on those architectures.
If you determine that it is not reasonable to support this package on arm64 then you will need to request the release team to manually unblock your package's migration to testing as the autopkgtest infrastructure currently requires that arch all packages are installable on arm64 (this is considered to be a bug, but noone seems in any hurry to fix it).
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list