Comments regarding netgen_6.2.1810+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes

Sean Whitton spwhitton at spwhitton.name
Sat Jun 6 16:54:56 BST 2020


Hello,

On Wed 27 May 2020 at 01:45AM -05, Kurt Kremitzki wrote:

> This is an upstream bug which I recognized as a problem in this upload. I
> attempted a fix (note the .changes file lists the binary package libnglib-6.2),
> which I knew was not the ideal fix, but I figured by the time the new version
> got through NEW, I would know how to fix it correctly.
>
> I submitted a bug to upstream [1] which describes the fixes needed in their
> CMake configuration. If I don't hear from them before too long I will come up
> with a patch unilaterally which addresses this issue.
>
>> This seems especially pointless given that there are no rdepends on
>> sid, so far as I can tell.
>>
>
> FreeCAD has optional integration with netgen which has languished because of
> packaging problems which I am trying to address. Additionally, upstream's
> "main" effort, ngsolve, depends on netgen, but it isn't packaged yet.

So freecad will depend on netgen once this makes it into the archive?

>> Also, an ftptrainee noticed that d/copyright does not account for
>> debian/, ng/Togl-1.7 and ng/Togl2.1.  Do the copies of Togl make it
>> into the binary packages, or are they only used in the build process,
>> or what?
>
> ng/Togl-1.7 is leftover cruft, and ng/Togl2.1 is really only needed for Mac 
> builds, though a tiny patch is required to not use it during building. There
> is a libtogl.a produced during the build but not included in libnglib-dev (or
> elsewhere.) Both directories can be excluded in d/copyright and removed on the
> next upstream code import.

So, just to be clear, those copies do not make it into the binary package?

-- 
Sean Whitton



More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list