Bug#963250: openblas: Please build on armel

[Sébastien Villemot]

Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Control: tags -1 - patch

Le lundi 22 juin 2020 à 06:08 +0000, Mo Zhou a écrit :

> I second that enabling openblas on armel makes basically no sense.
> If you want a BLAS implementation that is possibly slightly faster
> than
> the standard src:lapack, please try using src:blis instead of
> src:openblas on armel, since src:blis contains some generic
> optimizations.

Thanks for your feedback. Updating metadata accordingly.

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  https://www.debian.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20200622/60818e0e/attachment-0001.sig>