tpot_0.11.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Christian Kastner
ckk at debian.org
Wed Mar 25 11:24:27 GMT 2020
On 25.03.20 03:11, Sean Whitton wrote:
> +----------------------+
> | REJECT reasoning |
> +----------------------+
>
> Looks to be LGPL not GPL.
Wow, what an oversight... Sorry about that. Fixed in git.
> +----------------------+
> | Other comments |
> +----------------------+
>
> ci\.travis_*.sh look to have a different copyright holder and license.
Those files indeed state "modified from [other GitHub repo]" but it
seems to be more of an "inspired by" for how to solve a simple issue.
travis_install.sh:
1. Installs packages in an environment
2. Prints Python module versions
travis_test.sh
3. Prints Python module versions
4. Invokes nosetests
I don't believe there is anything copyrightable there. Would you concur
with this assessment?
If not: the referenced GitHub repo contains no such files, only a .yml
file where the step 1. - 4. above are used (hence my "inspired by"
suspicion). So to err on the side of caution, I would simply remove
those two files form the source (it's already being dfsg-cleaned anyway).
In case I do the latter, I'd upload a new version to NEW with a +dfsg1
suffix -- is that correct?
Thanks,
Christian
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list