tpot_0.11.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Christian Kastner ckk at debian.org
Wed Mar 25 11:24:27 GMT 2020


On 25.03.20 03:11, Sean Whitton wrote:
> +----------------------+
> |   REJECT reasoning   |
> +----------------------+
> 
> Looks to be LGPL not GPL.

Wow, what an oversight... Sorry about that. Fixed in git.

> +----------------------+
> |    Other comments    |
> +----------------------+
> 
> ci\.travis_*.sh look to have a different copyright holder and license.

Those files indeed state "modified from [other GitHub repo]" but it
seems to be more of an "inspired by" for how to solve a simple issue.

travis_install.sh:
  1. Installs packages in an environment
  2. Prints Python module versions

travis_test.sh
  3. Prints Python module versions
  4. Invokes nosetests

I don't believe there is anything copyrightable there. Would you concur
with this assessment?

If not: the referenced GitHub repo contains no such files, only a .yml
file where the step 1. - 4. above are used (hence my "inspired by"
suspicion). So to err on the side of caution, I would simply remove
those two files form the source (it's already being dfsg-cleaned anyway).

In case I do the latter, I'd upload a new version to NEW with a +dfsg1
suffix -- is that correct?

Thanks,
Christian



More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list