Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3

Rebecca N. Palmer rebecca_palmer at zoho.com
Sun Nov 21 10:41:16 GMT 2021


Control: block 996584 by -1

On 21/11/2021 06:30, Graham Inggs wrote:
> It might be easier to upgrade to 1.2.4 first, then 1,3,x later.

Probably not, given that we're now trying to add Python 3.10 support 
(#996584), and pandas upstream's work on that is recent (maybe still 
unfinished): https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/41940

The 1.3.x currently in Salsa built last time I tried (before Python 
3.10), but is (intentionally, to avoid FTBFS) missing some 
documentation, and I haven't tested the reverse dependencies yet.



More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list