Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3
Rebecca N. Palmer
rebecca_palmer at zoho.com
Sun Nov 21 10:41:16 GMT 2021
Control: block 996584 by -1
On 21/11/2021 06:30, Graham Inggs wrote:
> It might be easier to upgrade to 1.2.4 first, then 1,3,x later.
Probably not, given that we're now trying to add Python 3.10 support
(#996584), and pandas upstream's work on that is recent (maybe still
unfinished): https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/41940
The 1.3.x currently in Salsa built last time I tried (before Python
3.10), but is (intentionally, to avoid FTBFS) missing some
documentation, and I haven't tested the reverse dependencies yet.
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list