Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not?

Rebecca N. Palmer rebecca_palmer at zoho.com
Sun Nov 28 19:12:18 GMT 2021


After build-testing about half of the reverse dependencies, failures 
that look new-pandas-related are cfgrib #1000726, joypy #1000727, 
python-skbio #1000752, and maybe hyperspy (not filed yet).

python-skbio and hyperspy already FTBFS for unrelated reasons (but fail 
more tests with new pandas), and joypy looks trivially fixable.

Given this and expecting to find a similar number in the other half, 
against pandas 1.3 working on python3.10 while 1.1 doesn't (#1000422), 
would you prefer to have pandas 1.3 in unstable now, or not?



More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list