Bug#1009191: cctbx: please re-enable building on riscv64
Neil Williams
codehelp at debian.org
Sat Apr 30 11:29:16 BST 2022
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:18:35 +0300
Andrius Merkys <merkys at debian.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2022-04-08 17:57, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > Building on riscv64 was silently disabled in 2021.12+ds1-3.
> > 2021.12+ds1-2 built successfully in the past [1], and 2021.12+ds1-4
> > continues to build in Ubuntu.
> >
> > Please re-enable building on riscv64 as we would like to promote
> > riscv64 to a release architecture.
>
> Neil, is there a particular reason riscv64 support was disabled in
> 2021.12+ds1-3?
I didn't see it as particularly likely that any real-world usage of
cctbx was manageable on any current RISCV64 hardware.
> cctbx seems to build fine on riscv64 now. Can it be
> re-enabled?
Probably, yes. I won't have time to do an upload soon though.
If someone else has time to do it as a team upload, go ahead.
--
Neil Williams
linux at codehelp.co.uk
https://linux.codehelp.co.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20220430/032e3ca6/attachment.sig>
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list