Bug#1012150: gummi: Gummi segfaults

[Bernhard Übelacker]

Am 23.06.22 um 20:06 schrieb Martin Dosch:
> I have both in the attached file, but `c` didn't help much as the
> process was gone…


Hello Martin,
thanks for the fast reply.

I assume the previous attempt was done within a terminal window
not being maximized, therefore not the whole "bt full" output
fitted to one screen, therefore gdb asks this question:
   --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging--
Using "c" was intended my me just as answer to this question by gdb.


So the function names are all equal with that in the upstream bug you found,
so I would assume both are the same issue.

Kind regards,
Bernhard