Bug#1012663: marked as done (paraview: FTBFS in unstable (error: expected identifier or ‘?=(=?UTF-8?Q?’ before numeric constant))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:47:51 +0000
with message-id <E1o6Yyt-000IPW-NN at fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1012663: fixed in paraview 5.10.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012663,
regarding paraview: FTBFS in unstable (error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before numeric constant)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1012663: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012663
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Bas Couwenberg <sebastic at xs4all.nl>
Subject: paraview: FTBFS in unstable (error: expected identifier or ?(? before numeric constant)
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 15:03:37 +0200
Size: 5795
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20220629/933c543f/attachment.eml>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org>
Subject: Bug#1012663: fixed in paraview 5.10.1-2
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:47:51 +0000
Size: 6156
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20220629/933c543f/attachment-0001.eml>