Bug#1006920: please split out a libtbbmalloc2 package, both in tbb and onetbb

[M. Zhou]

Hi Jose,

Could you please provide more details on "the split of the libraries
is breaking some common use cases"?

I cannot figure out what could happen if we split the library packages
from the links provided.

On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 17:58 +0100, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:30:53 +0100 Matthias Klose <doko at debian.org>
> wrote:
> > 
> > For Ubuntu, I'm going to rename the old libtbb-dev and libtbb-doc
> > packages to 
> > libtbb2-dev and libtbb2-doc, not sure if that's something you also
> > want to do in 
> > Debian, but for the next Ubuntu release we need to ship both
> > versions, or we 
> > need to remove packages like numba.
> 
> Following this up, the split of the libraries is breaking some common
> use cases in the robotics community, see
> https://github.com/ros-planning/navigation2/pull/2852#issuecomment-1072789270
> .
> 
> I think that it will handle nicely in Debian, for the next Ubuntu
> I've requested a sync from the experimental version (which is able to
> use new tbb)
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1965780
> 
> Thanks.