Bug#1008371: apertium-pol-szl: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met
Lucas Nussbaum
lucas at debian.org
Sat Mar 26 20:50:42 GMT 2022
Source: apertium-pol-szl
Version: 0.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lucas at debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220326 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
> checking for apertium >= 3.6.0... yes
> checking for lttoolbox >= 3.5.0... yes
> checking for cg3 >= 1.3.0... yes
> checking for apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2... no
> configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met
>
> No package 'apertium-lex-tools' found
>
> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
> installed software in a non-standard prefix.
>
> Alternatively, you may set the environment variables APERTIUM_LEX_TOOLS_CFLAGS
> and APERTIUM_LEX_TOOLS_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
> See the pkg-config man page for more details.
> tail -v -n \+0 config.log
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/03/26/apertium-pol-szl_0.2.1-2_unstable.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list