paraview_5.11.2+dfsg-2_source.changes REJECTED

Drew Parsons dparsons at debian.org
Wed Dec 6 09:45:33 GMT 2023


On 2023-12-06 08:29, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Hi Drew,
> 
> * Drew Parsons <dparsons at debian.org> [2023-12-05 10:10]:
>> On 2023-12-05 05:18, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:27:53PM +0100, Drew Parsons wrote:
>>>> On 2023-12-04 23:24, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>>>>> paraview source: lintian output: 'license-problem-json-evil
>>>>> VTK/ThirdParty/fides/vtkfides/thirdparty/rapidjson/fidesrapidjson/license.txt',
>>>>> automatically rejected package.
>>>>> paraview source: If you have a good reason, you may override this
>>>>> lintian tag.
>>>> Hi guys, can you please explain this rejection?
>>> 
>>> Well, did you check the specified file?  What does it say?
>>> 
>>>> I did add a lintian override to paraview 5.11.2+dfsg-2.
>>> 
>>> Did you exclude from source the code specified in that file?
>> 
>> As I said, yes, I did.  Did you read the changelog?
>> 
>> Please let 5.11.2+dfsg-2 in.
> 
> Afaik ftp-master is running bullseye and lintian changed it's syntax
> in bookworm, so you need to use the old syntax here.


Thanks for explaining the problem, Jochen.

We build the packages against unstable, so it's unhelpful to have 
different lintian errors.  It means we are unable to use lintian to test 
if there are any problems with the packaging. Then uploading becomes 
trial and error, which is not efficient.

Can I propose the lintian version from bookworm be built on ftp-master 
to enable a consistent build environment

Can a manual override be applied to enable paraview uploads until the 
version of lintian on ftp-master gets fixed?

Drew



More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list