Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5
Andreas Tille
tille at debian.org
Wed Jan 25 09:43:55 GMT 2023
Hi Graham
Am Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50:41PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
>
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 00:16, Rebecca N. Palmer <rebecca_palmer at zoho.com> wrote:
> > The remaining autopkgtest failures blocking pandas are:
> > - dipy/amd64 and snakemake/i386 look like random flakiness: please retry
> > them. (I think DMs can't use the self-service interface.) Or for dipy,
> > see #1029533 for a possible fix.
>
> These have cleared up.
>
> > - python-xarray/i386 looks like xarray not pandas: see #1004869.
>
> Sometimes britney is too greedy and pins too many packages from
> unstable. I managed to find the right combination [1] and got the
> test to pass without python-xarray.
Thanks a lot.
> > - dask and dask.distributed have to go together, with or before pandas.
>
> There's nothing in the currently uploaded packages that specifies
> this, although I do see a commit on salsa [2].
I was motivated for this patch by Diane's statement on the Debian Med
matrix channel that dask and dask.distributed are interconnected. If
the autopkgtest on Salsa CI[4] would have passed I would have uploaded.
Unfortunately I have no idea how to deal with those
PytestUnraisableExceptionWarnings raised in this test and thus I did
not upload.
> I tried running dask.distributed's autopkgtest with dask and itself
> from unstable [3], but no luck.
Diane, could you please comment on this or at least throw some ENOTIME
error to let others know.
Thanks a lot for you contribution in any case
Andreas.
> [1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-xarray/testing/i386/
> [2] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/dask.distributed/-/commit/9df3fe1a0ea7538f742ebb162379e3cd50b388e6
> [3] https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dask.distributed/testing/amd64/
[4] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/dask.distributed/-/jobs/3834919
--
http://fam-tille.de
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list