Bug#1061954: frog: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Joost van Baal-Ilić
joostvb-debian at mdcc.cx
Fri Feb 2 14:04:24 GMT 2024
Hi,
[sorry for yet another one, i clicked sent too early...]
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 03:01:04PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 02:22:20PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> >
> > On second thought, I read https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time and
> > checked the updated Frog sources, there is no time_t exposed at all anymore
> > in the new version I'm packaging.
>
> That's nice.
>
> > So if I understand things correctly, the new
> > libfrog3 library does not need the t64 transition and I can revert
> > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/frog/-/commit/2bbda8d92d40b96a216e8d8db972a9589f8df02f ?
>
>
> > > Afaik the plan is to keep the binary packages named lib<foo>t64 (reading
> > > https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time ); this helps executing the
> > > transition.
> >
> > I'll rebase so the libfrog2t64 patch is included, but it'll be
> > immediately superseded by libfrog3.
>
> Upcoming stable release could likely ship both frog2 and frog3. E.g. if
> testing around release-time ships binaries build-depending upon frog2, this
> will happen.
Wow, having just read Message-Id: <CYUMSR5QIVHF.1TRNK0G75U8VQ at anaproy.nl> to
debian-science, we might indeed succeed in shipping upcoming Debian stable
without frog2.
Bye,
Joost
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list