Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1
Julian Gilbey
julian at d-and-j.net
Tue Jan 23 12:38:08 GMT 2024
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 08:50:55PM +0000, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> On 22/01/2024 11:51, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Please could we wait until the "Python 3.12 is a supported version"
> > transition is completed?
>
> How are you defining that? python3-defaults 3.11.6+ in testing? (I was
> previously told 3.12-supporting pandas and numpy in testing, which has
> happened. I don't think any of these 25 packages are on
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python3-defaults , but I haven't
> checked carefully, and at least influxdb-python and tqdm do have what I
> suspect are Python 3.12 related issues.)
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.12-add.html
We're nearly there (the transition page says it's 99% done), and when
this transition is complete, then python3-defaults 3.11.6+ will be
able to migrate to testing.
I don't fully understand the problem with transitions, but there was a
request to hold back with significant upgrades until a
python3.12-supporting python3-defaults has reached testing.
> > Adding another 25 or so RC bugs at this
> > point will just slow down that transition.
>
> What exactly do you want not done until then? Just not uploading pandas
> 2.x to unstable, or is it also a problem to have these bugs marked as RC in
> the BTS? (In all 22 cases that are in testing at all, the bug is also
> present in the version in testing, so it being RC shouldn't block
> migration.)
Yes - please don't upload it to unstable yet. Uploading to
experimental is fine.
> > (Unless pandas 1.5 is
> > preventing the transition, that is.)
>
> It isn't.
Good!
Julian
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list