Bug#1119760: plplot: FTBFS: /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/bindings/python/plplotcPYTHON_wrap.c:23948:3: error: returning 'void *' from a function with return type 'int' makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]

[Santiago Vila]

On Sat, Nov 01, 2025 at 02:50:06PM +0100, Rafael Laboissière wrote:

> > If you think it would be faster by filing a new report, I would use the
> > source package src:numpy for that ("please package this new version
> > because plplot requires it" or something alike).
> 
> The Debian package for NumPy is already up to date in relation to the
> upstream version (2.3.4). To fix the problem, the package maintainers will
> need to apply the patch I proposed upstream (which has not yet been
> integrated). [1]
> 
> My question was: if I were to file a bug report against the numpy package
> again, would it be appropriate to declare that the new bug affects
> src:plplot, even though the current bug has already been closed?

Ah, I see.

Yes, I think so. In this case, I would count "I would prefer not
having to use this workaround which I applied" as a valid use of
affects.

Thanks.