hfst_3.17.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Tino Didriksen]

It's not as serious as it looks, and it's mostly the source files that are
wrong, not d/copyright. See https://github.com/hfst/hfst/issues/494 for
history - in 2021 I confirmed with upstream that the intended license is "3
or later", but not all files were changed to say so. I suppose I could do
that, but that would have to wait for next upstream release.

The remaining minor issues are fixed in git
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/hfst/-/commit/09c9a9d2 so they'll be
in next upload, which would be -3 as I already made a -2 to fix a piuparts
issue. Also added a comment until upstream files are corrected.

Would you prefer I upload -3, or can -2 be accepted and the rest wait for
next release?

-- Tino Didriksen


On Wed, 29 Apr 2026 at 16:10, Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde at debian.org>
wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> please list the files with the correct licenses.
>
> I randomly checked the list in the public notes and also saw the
> differences.
>
> Thanks
>
> Further information may be found at:
>    https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/hfst
>
> Regards, Mechtilde Stehmann
> Member of the DFSG, Licensing & New Packages Team
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20260429/a53107e3/attachment.htm>