Bug#1128257: package doesn't build with the armhf baseline
Drew Parsons
dparsons at debian.org
Tue Feb 17 12:23:58 GMT 2026
Source: xsimd
Followup-For: Bug #1128257
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-arm at lists.debian.org, Matthias Klose <doko at debian.org>
User: debian-arm at lists.debian.org
Usertags: armhf
Control: reopen -1
Matthias Klose wrote:
> GCC should not ICE, however the real issue seems to be the build with
> -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=vfpv3, which doesn't match our baseline for armhf.
Mathias, these flags were added to the xsimd build to avoid accessing
the NEON code path on armhf, which is still an issue
cf. https://github.com/xtensor-stack/xsimd/issues/889
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/30190
If -mfpu=vfpv3 is not constructive to use now, can you advise on the
right flag for switching off neon? Is it
-cpu neon=off
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list