Bug#1121177: openblas breaks multiple autopkgtest on ppc64el

[Paul Gevers]

Control: close -1
# Because I filed this bug myself, I decided to use this command; don't 
imitate lightly

Hi Trupti,

On 1/16/26 10:00, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 janvier 2026 à 20:29 +0100, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>> On 1/14/26 20:05, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>>> Paul: if my statement above is correct, what would be the right course
>>> of action?
>>
>> The right action would be to get those pacakges fixed, e.g. via filing
>> bugs (cloning and reassigning might be appropriate). When the bugs are
>> in place, I can hint src:openblas into testing.
> 
> Thanks, this has been done by Trupti.


After hitting the sent button, I realized I hadn't been overly explicit. 
Let me try to explain what I had in mind. As we now consider the bugs to 
lie in the other packages, after the reassigning there shouldn't be a 
bug against src:openblas anymore. This bug is (until my close trickles 
through) blocking migration. It is also no longer actionable by the 
openblas maintainers. If I had done the bug management, I would have 
first fixed metadata (removal of current affects, removal of help tag) 
and then reassigned the two clones and the original. Also please be 
aware that the maintainers of the packages you reassign bugs to only get 
a mail from the bts with the results of the control commands. It is 
considered courtesy to CC them on the reassign message (e.g. by using 
<package>@packages.debian.org) with a short explanation for the reassign.

Paul

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 585 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20260118/a173d293/attachment-0001.sig>