Bug#1140050: trilinos: trilinos-doc is not reproducible
Graham Inggs
ginggs at debian.org
Mon Jun 15 10:50:03 BST 2026
Source: trilinos
Version: 16.1.0-5
Severity: serious
Hi Maintainer
>From the info page at reproduce.debian.net [1]:
all
[BAD] trilinos-doc 16.1.0-5 [log] [diffoscope]
amd64
[GOOD] libtrilinos-amesos-16.1 16.1.0-5+b1 [log] [attestation]
[GOOD] libtrilinos-amesos-dev 16.1.0-5+b1 [log] [attestation]
[GOOD] libtrilinos-amesos2-16.1 16.1.0-5+b1 [log] [attestation]
...
This currently blocks migration to testing. I have copied what I hope
is the relevant part of the log below. In case it is relevant, the
binNMUs seem to be reproducible, but the arch:all binary does not.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://reproduce.debian.net/excuses.html?source_name=trilinos
│ │ ├── ./usr/share/doc/trilinos/teuchos/_formulas.log.gz
│ │ │ ├── _formulas.log
│ │ │ │ @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
│ │ │ │ -This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.28 (TeX Live
2025/Debian) (preloaded format=latex 2026.3.6) 6 MAR 2026 22:53
│ │ │ │ +This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.28 (TeX Live
2025/Debian) (preloaded format=latex 2026.3.12) 12 MAR 2026 10:32
│ │ │ │ entering extended mode
│ │ │ │ restricted \write18 enabled.
│ │ │ │ %&-line parsing enabled.
│ │ │ │ **_formulas
│ │ │ │ (./_formulas.tex
│ │ │ │ LaTeX2e <2025-11-01>
│ │ │ │ L3 programming layer <2026-01-19>
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list