[Debian-science-sagemath] Getting sagemath back into testing

[Dima Pasechnik]

On Mon, 9 Nov 2020, 13:55 Jerome BENOIT, <calculus at rezozer.net> wrote:

>
>
> On 09/11/2020 14:27, Julien Puydt wrote:
> > Le lundi 09 novembre 2020 à 11:49 +0000, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
> >
> >> Off-topic, before I forgot - why is giac in Debian/Ubuntu built with
> >> static libnauty, rather than the dynamic one?
> >
> > I've been maintaining the giac package in Debian the recent years, and
> > as far as I know, the nauty code in giac is disabled -- neither static
> > nor dynamic is used.
> >
> > Can you tell more?
>
> Past nauty upstream sources did not build a dynamic library.
> I had brought a dynamic nauty library to Debian.
> So I guess that the default for giac is to built against a static nauty
> library (if enabled).
>
the default for upstream is to link with
-lnauty

Upstream has no preference for static linking or disabled nauty - so I
gather Debian does something leading to the current state of giac on
Debian/Ubuntu in this respect.





> Best,
> Jerome
>
> >
> > JP
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Debian-science-sagemath mailing list
> > Debian-science-sagemath at alioth-lists.debian.net
> >
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath
> >
>
> --
> Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus@rezozer.net
> AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-science-sagemath mailing list
> Debian-science-sagemath at alioth-lists.debian.net
>
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-sagemath/attachments/20201109/9cae4bd5/attachment-0001.html>