[Debian-science-sagemath] Getting sagemath back into testing

[Julien Puydt]

Hi

Le lun. 9 nov. 2020 à 16:30, Dima Pasechnik <dimpase at gmail.com> a écrit :

>
>
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2020, 13:55 Jerome BENOIT, <calculus at rezozer.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 09/11/2020 14:27, Julien Puydt wrote:
>> > Le lundi 09 novembre 2020 à 11:49 +0000, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>> >
>> >> Off-topic, before I forgot - why is giac in Debian/Ubuntu built with
>> >> static libnauty, rather than the dynamic one?
>> >
>> > I've been maintaining the giac package in Debian the recent years, and
>> > as far as I know, the nauty code in giac is disabled -- neither static
>> > nor dynamic is used.
>> >
>> > Can you tell more?
>>
>> Past nauty upstream sources did not build a dynamic library.
>> I had brought a dynamic nauty library to Debian.
>> So I guess that the default for giac is to built against a static nauty
>> library (if enabled).
>>
> the default for upstream is to link with
> -lnauty
>
> Upstream has no preference for static linking or disabled nauty - so I
> gather Debian does something leading to the current state of giac on
> Debian/Ubuntu in this respect.
>

Something like compiling without any nasty in sight?

Is it an actual issue?

JP

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-sagemath/attachments/20201109/39c3e04f/attachment.html>