[Debian-science-sagemath] Getting sagemath back into testing

Tobias Hansen thansen at debian.org
Sat Oct 31 12:10:20 GMT 2020


Good idea: https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/2959

On 10/31/20 11:30 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> did you file an issue with openblas? they are usually quick to respond.
>
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2020, 11:25 Tobias Hansen, <thansen at debian.org <mailto:thansen at debian.org>> wrote:
>
>     I meant openblas issue on arm64...
>
>     On 10/31/20 11:21 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>     > Hi again,
>     >
>     > the ECL issue should hopefully be fixed now and the pari 2.13 transition will surely be handled by sagemath developers soon.
>     >
>     > That leaves us with the openblas issue on amd64. It would be great if someone could help looking into it.
>     >
>     > Best,
>     > Tobias
>     >
>     > On 10/30/20 9:53 PM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>     >> Hi everyone,
>     >>
>     >> the testing freeze for bullseye is getting closer (starting in January) and the sagemath package itself is in a better state than ever. We should try to get it back into testing.
>     >>
>     >> The following issues have to be solved:
>     >>
>     >> - giac needs to transition to testing. The problem are failing tests on ppc64el and s390x.
>     >>
>     >> - sage FTBFS on arm64 due to a segfault in openblas: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970558
>     >>
>     >> - sage FTBFS on ppc64el and ppc64 due to a segfault in ECL: https://gitlab.com/embeddable-common-lisp/ecl/-/issues/612
>     >>
>     >> - cypari2 needs to be updated for pari 2.13: https://github.com/sagemath/cypari2/pull/99
>     >>
>     >> After fixing these issues sage should be able to transition to testing.
>     >>
>     >> sage also FTBFS on armhf and mips64el, there I don't even know why...
>     >>
>     >> Any help is appreciated!
>     >>
>     >> Best,
>     >>
>     >> Tobias
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Debian-science-sagemath mailing list
>     >> Debian-science-sagemath at alioth-lists.debian.net <mailto:Debian-science-sagemath at alioth-lists.debian.net>
>     >> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Debian-science-sagemath mailing list
>     > Debian-science-sagemath at alioth-lists.debian.net <mailto:Debian-science-sagemath at alioth-lists.debian.net>
>     > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Debian-science-sagemath mailing list
>     Debian-science-sagemath at alioth-lists.debian.net <mailto:Debian-science-sagemath at alioth-lists.debian.net>
>     https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-science-sagemath mailing list
> Debian-science-sagemath at alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-sagemath/attachments/20201031/6c3f05a5/attachment.html>


More information about the Debian-science-sagemath mailing list