[Debian-science-sagemath] 7.4 with the latest shiny new packages: 4000 failed tests

[Tobias Hansen]

That totally fixed it! Thanks a lot!

Now we are back to 75 failing tests.

Next we need to figure out how to use the Debian unstable packages of
singular, gap, maxima and planarity.

We also need to finish packaging the last parts of the different notebooks.

I don't know if you guys saw the mail on debian-devel-announce today. In
December the testing migration time will be set to 10 days. Adding the
time required to pass the NEW queue, it would be good if we could upload
a first sagemath package in the beginning of December to make the
January 5 freeze.

Best,
Tobias

On 11/05/2016 08:40 PM, François Bissey wrote:
> Hum… would including https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21749 improve things?
> Some stuff in the building of matrix_integer_dense is fragile in my opinion.
> 
> François
> 
>> On 6/11/2016, at 09:33, Tobias Hansen <thansen at debian.org> wrote:
>>
>> We already used linbox 1.4.2 with sage 7.3 and didn't have these test
>> failures.
>>
>> On 11/05/2016 08:31 PM, François Bissey wrote:
>>> *cough* upgrading linbox from 1.3.2 to 1.4.2 in sage 7.4?
>>>
>>>> On 6/11/2016, at 09:23, Tobias Hansen <thansen at debian.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm just wondering why this started to show with sage 7.4.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Debian-science-sagemath mailing list
>>> Debian-science-sagemath at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Debian-science-sagemath mailing list
>> Debian-science-sagemath at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-science-sagemath mailing list
> Debian-science-sagemath at lists.alioth.debian.org
> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath
>