[Secure-testing-commits] r15974 - in data: . CPE

Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilbert at gmail.com
Wed Jan 26 21:37:46 UTC 2011


On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:05:09 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Michael Gilbert]
> > Is this the best way to do this?  Would it be better for this info
> > to be declared in package control files so it can be automatically
> > aggregated when changes happen?  Otherwise, this file is bound to
> > get outdated.
> 
> As I said on debian-devel@, I suspect adding it to debian/control in
> each package is a good idea, but saw no point in waiting for that to
> happen before testing the idea of comparing NVD and the Debian CVE
> list.
> 
> When the file is outdated, we can hopefully generate it from the
> control files in the archive. :)

OK, seems logical.  Just curious, how did you generate this initial
cross-reference?  Was it automated, and are you sure that its 100%
accurate?

Also, is there any value in including packages that don't have a CPE
yet?

Best wishes,
Mike



More information about the Secure-testing-commits mailing list