[Debian-sponsors-discuss] What are we doing and what more can we do to reward companies and individuals that are supporting Debian?

[Stefano Zacchiroli]

On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:08:39PM +0200, Dr. Michael Meskes wrote:
> > In other words, if we clearly set the criteria for what participation
> > in debian-companies means, what the goals are, and what is and isn't
> > allowed on the list, quality can be maintained.
> 
> Well, this is why we added the 2DD rule, everthing else might be too
> complicated to check.

Just a comment on this: as long as the "n DD rule" has n >= 1, I believe
we can delegate the check to the DD in question: he is already a trusted
member of the Debian Project, I believe we should trust her for
evaluating the other criteria.

That said, I've already mentioned that "1 DD + size >= k" is the way we
should go, and I don't think we need any more complex criteria than
that. (As a corollary of the previous paragraph, I'm fine trusting the
DD in question to certify the company size.)


I entirely agree with all other points of your mail.


Cheers.
-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli  . . . . . . .  zack at upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o
Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
Former Debian Project Leader  . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o .
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-sponsors-discuss/attachments/20130604/9f39be96/attachment.pgp>