[Debian-sponsors-discuss] Which existing Debian teams and initiatives should we include in overall fundraising?

[Brian Gupta]

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Brian Gupta <brian.gupta at brandorr.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
> <lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 29/05/13 at 16:54 -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
>>> proposed: debconf-sponsors-team (bgupta)
>>> proposed: debian-companies (bgupta)
>>> proposed: debian-partners (bgupta)
>>> proposed: debian-auditor (bgupta)
>>
>> hardware-donations@ is another team that should be in the loop.
>
> Thanks Lucas. I added it to the wiki. This is the new list:
>
> proposed: debconf-sponsors-team (bgupta)
> proposed: debian-companies (bgupta)
> proposed: debian-partners (bgupta)
> proposed: debian-auditor (bgupta)
> proposed: hardware-donations (lucas)
>
> If there is consensus here, how (and when) do we go about inviting
> these groups/teams to participate in this discussion? (I've already
> invited auditor@, and we can invite debconf-sponsors-team during the
> next team meeting, but I was under the impression that a number of
> these lists are closed lists?)

At this point we haven't gotten any negative feedback or additions to
this list in almost a week. Would anyone be opposed if I started
inviting these groups to join the conversation?

proposed: debian-auditor (bgupta) (I already invited)
proposed: debconf-sponsors-team (bgupta) (I plan to invite team during
meeting today)
proposed: debian-companies (bgupta)
proposed: debian-partners (bgupta)
proposed: hardware-donations (lucas)
proposed: debian-consultants (bgupta)

Thanks,
Brian

>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
>> Lucas