[Debian-sponsors-discuss] What are we doing and what more can we do to reward companies and individuals that are supporting Debian?

[Lucas Nussbaum]

On 04/06/13 at 19:16 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 03/06/13 at 14:49 +0200, Dr. Michael Meskes wrote:
> > > I'm thinking out loud here, but I wonder if the coordinator of that
> > > group should not be someone who is not linked to any of the
> > > involved companies.
> > 
> > THere are good reasosn for that, yes. But there are also good reasons
> > for wanting the coordinator being involved himself, too. After all this
> > group should help *all* companies and I don't see how you can do that by
> > favouring one.
> 
> OK, fair enough.
> 
> > I'm not eager to be that person, though. I'm fine with somebody else.
> > I'd just like to get going.
> 
> No, I agree that getting things going here is important. Please consider
> yourself "approved" as the coordinator of that initiative.
> 
> Could you please raise the topic of the criterias for list membership on
> -project@ (probably with a specific proposal -- there's a high potential
> for bikeshedding here :) )?
> 
> Also, generally, I would like us to keep an open mind about the goals
> and inner workings of debian-companies at . For example, you mentioned the
> idea of using -companies@ as a contact point for questions about deploying
> Debian in complex setups. I agree that discussions about setting up a
> coordinated support infrastructure should happen on that list, but I am not
> convinced that the list should serve as a contact point for such support
> requests.

Hi Michael,

Ping on that?
 
Lucas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-sponsors-discuss/attachments/20130808/c1415cf7/attachment.sig>