[xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#442292: Bug#442292:
mh at glandium.org
Mon Sep 17 18:07:57 UTC 2007
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 01:24:41PM -0400, Justin M. Keyes <justinkz at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/17/07, Justin M. Keyes <justinkz at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/17/07, Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org> wrote:
> > > Try something like strace -eopen -f update-mime-database 2>&1 | grep libz.so
> > > and check where libz.so is taken from.
> > > If it's not taken in /usr/lib or /lib, then you're likely to have a
> > > broken LD_LIBRARY_PATH and/or a spurious libz.so somewhere else.
> > $ strace -eopen -f update-mime-database 2>&1 | grep libz.so
> > open("/usr/local/lib/libz.so.1", O_RDONLY) = 3
> > [snip]
> > Should I set the soft link at /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1 to point to
> > /usr/lib/libz.so.22.214.171.124 (seems a tenuous solution)?
> I tried this. It works long enough to let me update some packages, but
> then 'apt-get dist-upgrade' sets it back at some point. Re-setting the
> link (again) to point to /usr/lib/libz.so.126.96.36.199 and running apt-get
> dist-upgrade multiple times allowed me to get my system up-to-date.
> But each time, apt-get seems to set /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1 to point
> to /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1.2.3.
Then you should try something like dpkg -S /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1.
More information about the debian-xml-sgml-pkgs