[Debichem-devel] Bug#446726: file conflicts between packages

[Manuel Prinz]

Hi Bernd!

Am Montag, den 15.10.2007, 13:23 +0200 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz:
> I can also rename genbox to radgenbox.
> I guess your package attracts more people, so it should probably keep
> the binaries name. On the other side - if genbox is only rarely used in
> gromacs, the better thing would be to rename it there probably.

As a GROMACS user, I'd prefer to keep the name "genbox" since it's one
of the tools in the GROMACS suite that is used quite often and a lot of
my scripts would need an update to work on a name change. I think there
are more people in the same situation.

On the other hand, one of GROMCAS's tools has been renamed already.
(ffscan, renamed to g_ffscan.) Since this one is rarely used (at least
by me), I didn't find that bothering.

I don't mind if genbox will be renamed. I just wanted to express my
concerns.

Best regards
Manuel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debichem-devel/attachments/20071015/962fcc59/attachment.pgp