[Debichem-devel] Comments regarding lutefisk_1.0.5a.cleaned-1_amd64.changes

Filippo Rusconi rusconi-debian at laposte.net
Fri Dec 11 20:02:57 UTC 2009

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 06:58:37PM +0000, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Hello maintainer,

Hello Barry,

> I am going to accept lutefisk.

Thank you,

> However, I am not quite sure why you didn't wipe everything in the
> windoze/ dir when you repacked.

I suspected that the other files were project configuration files
which were not necessarily to be removed (even if these are in a
binary format, which is common on MS-Windows, and even if I did not
make use of these files).

> Also, I am highly suspicious that src/getopt.* are really (C) the
> author of lutefisk and not taken from the FSF getopt.

Well spotted, however it could be a public domain implementation of
getopt as found in a number of places : 


although it might be difficult to establish it with certainty.

> Thank you,

To you :)

Best regards,

Filippo Rusconi, PhD - CNRS - public key C78F687C
Author of ``massXpert''     at http://www.massxpert.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debichem-devel/attachments/20091211/7a18e281/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Debichem-devel mailing list