[Debichem-devel] cclib

Karol M. Langner karol.langner at gmail.com
Wed Apr 13 13:20:48 UTC 2011


On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:39:21PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 12.04.2011, 11:00 +0200 schrieb Karol M. Langner:
> > Hi,
> > 
> >  Thanks for looking at it! I fixed all the things you pointed out and
> > commited the changes, with comments bellow.
> 
> besides everything else, there are several other issues. lintian e.g.
> complains pretty much:
> 
> > W: cclib source: build-depends-on-python-dev-with-no-arch-any
> > W: cclib: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
> > W: cclib: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/ccget
> > W: cclib: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/cda
> > E: cclib: python-script-but-no-python-dep usr/bin/ccget
> > E: cclib: python-script-but-no-python-dep usr/bin/cda
> > W: cclib: package-contains-upstream-install-documentation usr/share/doc/cclib/INSTALL
> > W: cclib: extra-license-file usr/share/doc/cclib/LICENSE.gz
> > W: python-cclib: wrong-section-according-to-package-name python-cclib => python
> > W: python-cclib: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
> > W: python-cclib: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/ccget
> > W: python-cclib: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/cda
> > E: python-cclib: python-script-but-no-python-dep usr/bin/ccget
> > E: python-cclib: python-script-but-no-python-dep usr/bin/cda

After my last commits, lintian outputs just warnings:

W: python-cclib: wrong-section-according-to-package-name python-cclib => python
W: python-cclib: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
W: cclib: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
W: cclib: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/ccget
W: cclib: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/cda
W: cclib: package-contains-upstream-install-documentation usr/share/doc/cclib/INSTALL
W: cclib: extra-license-file usr/share/doc/cclib/LICENSE.gz

Do I need to act on any of these?

- Karol

-- 
written by Karol Langner
Wed Apr 13 15:19:32 CEST 2011



More information about the Debichem-devel mailing list