[Debichem-devel] cclib

[Karol M. Langner]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 08:31:09AM -0700, Nicholas Breen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:54:46AM +0200, Karol M. Langner wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:19:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > Finally, I think it would be prudent to tighten the Depends of cclib on
> > > python-cclib, currently it is unversioned.  Not sure how tightly the
> > > scripts (and tests I guess) are coupled to python-cclib, but as the
> > > scripts appear non-trivial. I would say a (= ${source:Version}) would
> > > be ok, but what do the others think?
> > 
> > I added (= 1.0.1-1)... should that debianic "-1" be there?
> 
> Probably better to use the (= ${source:Version}) construct instead of
> hardcoding a version number.  Doing so both means that you don't have to change
> it every time you make a new upload, and makes life easier for possible NMUers.

Yes! Thanks, done in r2721.

-- 
written by Karol M. Langner
Wed Apr 20 10:09:53 CEST 2011