[Debichem-devel] [Debichem-commits] r3198 - in /unstable/nwchem/debian: changelog control rules watch
Michael Banck
mbanck at debian.org
Thu Feb 2 22:46:54 UTC 2012
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:34:43PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 02.02.2012, 00:34 +0100 schrieb Michael Banck:
> [..]
> > > -Priority: optional
> > > +Priority: extra
> >
> > I just saw this while updating NWChem. You cite section 2.5, but AFAICT
> > there are no conflict. Is this because NWChem is "only likely to be useful
> > if you already know what [it is]"? Maybe we should set a general policy
> > here, but I never liked Priority: extra for that, unless there was
> > indeed a conflict.
>
> There is a policy violation:
> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=nwchem
Meh, vicious circle.
> (and JFTR: it does not build on other architectures != *i386).
Yeah, I know. I've been trying the last couple of days to get it
working on at least amd64. It builds, but the test suite still fails.
Michael
More information about the Debichem-devel
mailing list