[Debichem-devel] [Debichem-commits] r3198 - in /unstable/nwchem/debian: changelog control rules watch

Michael Banck mbanck at debian.org
Thu Feb 2 22:46:54 UTC 2012


On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:34:43PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 02.02.2012, 00:34 +0100 schrieb Michael Banck:
> [..]
> > > -Priority: optional
> > > +Priority: extra
> > 
> > I just saw this while updating NWChem.  You cite section 2.5, but AFAICT
> > there are no conflict.  Is this because NWChem is "only likely to be useful
> > if you already know what [it is]"?  Maybe we should set a general policy
> > here, but I never liked Priority: extra for that, unless there was
> > indeed a conflict.
> 
> There is a policy violation:
> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=nwchem

Meh, vicious circle.

> (and JFTR: it does not build on other architectures != *i386).

Yeah, I know.  I've been trying the last couple of days to get it
working on at least amd64.  It builds, but the test suite still fails.


Michael



More information about the Debichem-devel mailing list