[Debichem-devel] jgromacs package seems useful

"Steffen Möller" steffen_moeller at gmx.de
Thu May 17 13:16:44 UTC 2012


Heyho Daniel,

> I now also added the javadoc part and used javahelper to do all the
> things necessary to create the package. This should reduce package
> maintenance. Hope this was ok with you.

Excellent! I had complete trust and did not even check :o)
 
> PS: Auf die Männer ;)

To those of you relying on some Google service here for a translation ... this refers to certain local customs on Ascension Day. The German page of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Father%27s_Day or this youtube video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=930UINu3-Fs is more informative on what is going on in the area if you do not package bits and pieces for Debian.

Cheers,

Steffen

> Am Donnerstag, den 17.05.2012, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Steffen Möller:
> > On 05/17/2012 02:11 PM, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.05.2012, 13:08 +0200 schrieb "Steffen Möller":
> > > 
> > > [..]
> > >>>> One thing about README.source; I think if you do something fancy
> with
> > >>>> the original tarball, it would be best to supply a
> "get-orig-source"
> > >>>> script for the modifications.
> > >>
> > >> Right. This is why I had time to address the packaging and you had
> not :o)
> > > [..]
> > >>>> I take you based you packaging on "jgromacs_v1_src.tgz"?
> > >>
> > >> Yes.
> > >>
> > >>>> I just renamed the "source" directory inside the jgromacs tarball
> to
> > >>>> "jgromacs-1.0" here so far, and it build fine.  
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You wrote you removed jama, I think it is fine to keep it even if
> it is
> > >>>> not used in the build.  Unless we have to remove it due to some
> > >>>> licensing issues, which I guess is not the case?
> > >>
> > >> Hm. The debian/copyright file would need to be amended. IIRC
> correctly
> > >> then my build instructions only take code from the jgromacs
> subfolder,
> > >> i.e. the extra eyeballs on the Jama library remain established. That
> > >> is the only bit that is important to me, really. Leave it in if you
> > >> prefer, even though I had done that fancy GZIP=-9n while retaring.
> > > 
> > > Hi guys. I added a script to create the tarball and made some other
> > > changes, which I thought should be done.
> > 
> > Wow!
> > 
> > Many thanks and regards
> > 
> > Steffen
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Debichem-devel mailing list
> > Debichem-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debichem-devel
> 
> 



More information about the Debichem-devel mailing list