[Debichem-devel] [Debichem-commits] [debichem] r4720 - unstable/elkcode/debian

[Michael Banck]

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 08:49:43PM +0000, dleidert at alioth.debian.org wrote:
> * debian/rules (override_dh_install): Rename binary to elk-lapw (closes: #720044).

I think it would be better to keep the binary as "elk" and conflict with
the "elk" package.  The other elk package does not appear to be very
popular either and I cannot image a lot of users would like to install
both.

Is there some other disadvantages I am missing for a Conflicts?


Michael