[Debichem-devel] Bug#875268: nwchem: update BLACS configuration for scalapack 2

Drew Parsons dparsons at debian.org
Sun Sep 10 05:57:41 UTC 2017


Package: nwchem
Version: 6.6+r27746-4
Severity: normal

scalapack 2 is now available in unstable. It includes BLACS, so
libblacs-mpi-dev is now deprecated and must be removed from
Build-Depends.

Please update nwchem:

debian/control:
Build-Depends: autotools-dev (>> 20100122.1~),
               csh,
               debhelper (>= 7.0.50~),
               gfortran,
               libblas-dev,
               liblapack-dev,
               libscalapack-mpi-dev (>= 2),
               mpi-default-bin,
               mpi-default-dev,
               openssh-client,
               pkg-config,
               python-dev (>= 2.6.6-3~),
               texlive-latex-base,
               zlib1g-dev

debian/rules:
export BLACS=-lscalapack-$(ARCH_DEFAULT_MPI_IMPL)


(I can't upload an nmu because of bug#875267, sorry!)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages nwchem depends on:
ii  libatlas3-base [liblapack.so.3]    3.10.3-4
ii  libblas3 [libblas.so.3]            3.7.1-3
ii  libc6                              2.24-17
ii  libgcc1                            1:7.2.0-4
ii  libgfortran3                       6.4.0-5
ii  liblapack3 [liblapack.so.3]        3.7.1-3
ii  libopenblas-base [liblapack.so.3]  0.2.20+ds-3
ii  libopenmpi2                        2.1.1-6+b1
ii  libpython2.7                       2.7.13-4
ii  libquadmath0                       7.2.0-4
ii  mpi-default-bin                    1.9
ii  nwchem-data                        6.6+r27746-4
ii  zlib1g                             1:1.2.8.dfsg-5

nwchem recommends no packages.

nwchem suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



More information about the Debichem-devel mailing list