[Debichem-devel] Bug#1009281: Bug#1009281: Bug#1009281: Should cinfony be removed?

[Moritz Mühlenhoff]

Am Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 09:21:25AM +0200 schrieb Michael Banck:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 08:38:21AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 2022-04-11 01:35, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > Source: cinfony
> > > Version: 1.2-4
> > > Severity: serious
> > > 
> > > Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian:
> > > 
> > > - Still depends on Python 2 and thus removed from testing since 2019
> > > - Dead upstream
> > > - No reverse dependencies
> > 
> > Incidentally, I was the last to upload this package. Since 2019 there
> > were no uploads, due to aforementioned reasons. I have contemplated
> > filing for RM ever since, but did not get to it. I think it is fine to
> > remove. If Python 3 port ever happens, we can reintroduce the package then.
> 
> I contacted the author and asked him about it - it seems the master
> branch on Github has python3 support, but I didn't look very closely.

Did you get any reply? Otherwise let's go ahead with the removal.

Cheers,
        Moritz