[Debichem-devel] Bug#1019515: gemmi: autopkgtest regression on arm64 i386 s390x and ppc64el: numerical deltas
Paul Gevers
elbrus at debian.org
Sat Sep 10 22:06:22 BST 2022
Source: gemmi
Version: 0.5.6+ds-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-ci at lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of gemmi the autopkgtest of gemmi fails in testing
when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of gemmi from
unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In tabular
form:
pass fail
gemmi from testing 0.5.6+ds-2
all others from testing from testing
I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.
Currently this regression is blocking the migration to testing [1]. Can
you please investigate the situation and fix it?
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gemmi
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/g/gemmi/25899714/log.gz
=================================== FAILURES
===================================
__________________________ TestProg.test_sfcalc_1pfe
___________________________
self = <test_prog.TestProg testMethod=test_sfcalc_1pfe>
@unittest.skipIf(sys.platform == 'win32', 'with MSVC it differs
slightly')
def test_sfcalc_1pfe(self):
> self.do('''\
$ gemmi sfcalc --dmin=9 --rate=4 --blur=60 --rcut=1e-7 --test -v
tests/1pfe.cif.gz
[...]
RMSE=0.0010414 0.0001639% max|dF|=0.003530 R=0.000%
<dPhi>=8.067e-06
''') # noqa: E501
tests/test_prog.py:89: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ tests/test_prog.py:36: in do
self.assertEqual(expected_lines, output_lines)
E AssertionError: Lists differ: ['RMSE=0.0010414 0.0001639%
max|dF|=0.003530 R=0.000% <dPhi>=8.067e-06'] != ['RMSE=0.0010127
0.0001594% max|dF|=0.003041 R=0.000% <dPhi>=7.880e-06']
E E First differing element 0:
E 'RMSE=0.0010414 0.0001639% max|dF|=0.003530 R=0.000%
<dPhi>=8.067e-06'
E 'RMSE=0.0010127 0.0001594% max|dF|=0.003041 R=0.000%
<dPhi>=7.880e-06'
E E - ['RMSE=0.0010414 0.0001639% max|dF|=0.003530 R=0.000%
<dPhi>=8.067e-06']
E ? - ^ ^^ -- ^ --
E E + ['RMSE=0.0010127 0.0001594% max|dF|=0.003041 R=0.000%
<dPhi>=7.880e-06']
E ? ^^ ^ + ++ ++ ^
__________________________ TestProg.test_sfcalc_5wkd
___________________________
self = <test_prog.TestProg testMethod=test_sfcalc_5wkd>
@unittest.skipIf(sys.platform == 'win32', 'with MSVC it differs
slightly')
def test_sfcalc_5wkd(self):
> self.do('''\
$ gemmi sfcalc --blur=12 --dmin=2.5 --rate=2.5 --rcut=1e-7 --test
-v tests/5wkd.pdb
[...]
RMSE=3.3342e-05 4.703e-05% max|dF|=0.0001706 R=0.000%
<dPhi>=4.718e-06
''') # noqa: E501
tests/test_prog.py:81: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ tests/test_prog.py:36: in do
self.assertEqual(expected_lines, output_lines)
E AssertionError: Lists differ: ['RMSE=3.3342e-05 4.703e-05%
max|dF|=0.0001706 R=0.000% <dPhi>=4.718e-06'] != ['RMSE=3.2830e-05
4.630e-05% max|dF|=0.0001628 R=0.000% <dPhi>=4.665e-06']
E E First differing element 0:
E 'RMSE=3.3342e-05 4.703e-05% max|dF|=0.0001706 R=0.000%
<dPhi>=4.718e-06'
E 'RMSE=3.2830e-05 4.630e-05% max|dF|=0.0001628 R=0.000%
<dPhi>=4.665e-06'
E E - ['RMSE=3.3342e-05 4.703e-05% max|dF|=0.0001706 R=0.000%
<dPhi>=4.718e-06']
E ? ^^^ ^ - --
^^^
E E + ['RMSE=3.2830e-05 4.630e-05% max|dF|=0.0001628 R=0.000%
<dPhi>=4.665e-06']
E ? ++ ^ ^^ ++
^^^
=========================== short test summary info
============================
FAILED tests/test_prog.py::TestProg::test_sfcalc_1pfe - AssertionError:
Lists...
FAILED tests/test_prog.py::TestProg::test_sfcalc_5wkd - AssertionError:
Lists...
======================== 2 failed, 169 passed in 1.42s
=========================
autopkgtest [17:13:32]: test command1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debichem-devel/attachments/20220910/07a715b7/attachment.sig>
More information about the Debichem-devel
mailing list